shame

Nowadays, everyone uses Ubuntu, most people have used Fedora, and many folks have tried openSUSE. SimplyMEPIS ... not so many.

That's a shame, because this relatively obscure Debian-based desktop distribution from Morgantown, WV. is an outstanding desktop operating system.

Saying that FreeBSD is an excellent choice to build a server upon would be stating the blatantly obvious. Sadly though, FreeBSD as a desktop OS is a much less common sight.

This is a shame, particularly for developers who could have a desktop that closely mimics the configuration and behavior of FreeBSD servers in a remote datacenter.

Adam's Tech Talk: "The body is ever so slightly lop sided by a few mm here and there which is a shame however from a short distance you wouldn't notice, it stands up straight and weight distribution is equal throughout the base plate so I’m happy with it."

Open source embraces these other motivations. The motivation to create, the motivation to share, these are important in open source.

In Linux alone they’re worth $10.8 billion. While open source exists in the market, it also exists outside it, and above it, and around it.

There is no reason to feel shame in this. I think it’s kinda cool.

You probably noticed by now, that Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 aka "Lenny" hasn't been released in September. Well, that's a shame, but very easy to explain: Too many release critical bugs

Well, we all have used Unix, in one form or another . But which one is your favorite flavor of Unix-based/Unix-alike OSes?

Read more and vote! Update: SHAME on you, who ever you are: Messing/hacking with ...

The short take on the situation at Sun Microsystems is that it's a shame. It still has plenty of bright people, and it's been a wellspring of innovative ideas over the years.

"Ubuntu is the only Linux distro I know of that has its alphareleases slashdotted and dugg...which is a real shame; I think thereare more that deserve this treatment from linux media sites."

Saying that FreeBSD is an excellent choice to build a server upon would be stating the blatantly obvious. Sadly though, FreeBSD as a desktop OS is a much less common sight.

This is a shame, particularly for developers who could have a desktop that closely mimics the configuration of FreeBSD servers in a remote data center.

Very useful for testing!

I never thought I would see the day when a hard drive manufacturer would go from indifferent to outright stupid all with one drive release.

Apparently, it has happened. It seems that Seagate has opted to forgo compatibility for anyone other than Linux users and that’s a real shame, as I have always been a satisfied Seagate user.