Linux Science: 561 of 622 |
We can predict everything, except the future.
|
|
|
Linux Science: 562 of 622 |
We cannot command nature except by obeying her.
-- Sir Francis Bacon
|
|
|
Linux Science: 563 of 622 |
We dedicate this book to our fellow citizens who, for love of truth, take from
their own wants by taxes and gifts, and now and then send forth one of
themselves as dedicated servant, to forward the search into the mysteries and
marvelous simplicities of this strange and beautiful Universe, Our home.
-- "Gravitation", Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler
|
|
|
Linux Science: 564 of 622 |
"We don't care. We don't have to. We're the Phone Company."
|
|
|
Linux Science: 565 of 622 |
We don't know one millionth of one percent about anything.
|
|
|
Linux Science: 566 of 622 |
We don't know who it was that discovered water, but we're pretty sure
that it wasn't a fish.
-- Marshall McLuhan
|
|
|
Linux Science: 567 of 622 |
We gave you an atomic bomb, what do you want, mermaids?
-- I. I. Rabi to the Atomic Energy Commission
|
|
|
Linux Science: 568 of 622 |
We have a equal opportunity Calculus class -- it's fully integrated.
|
|
|
Linux Science: 569 of 622 |
We laugh at the Indian philosopher, who to account for the support
of the earth, contrived the hypothesis of a huge elephant, and to support
the elephant, a huge tortoise. If we will candidly confess the truth, we
know as little of the operation of the nerves, as he did of the manner in
which the earth is supported: and our hypothesis about animal spirits, or
about the tension and vibrations of the nerves, are as like to be true, as
his about the support of the earth. His elephant was a hypothesis, and our
hypotheses are elephants. Every theory in philosophy, which is built on
pure conjecture, is an elephant; and every theory that is supported partly
by fact, and partly by conjecture, is like Nebuchadnezzar's image, whose
feet were partly of iron, and partly of clay.
-- Thomas Reid, "An Inquiry into the Human Mind", 1764
|
|
|
Linux Science: 570 of 622 |
... we must be wary of granting too much power to natural selection
by viewing all basic capacities of our brain as direct adaptations.
I do not doubt that natural selection acted in building our oversized
brains -- and I am equally confident that our brains became large as
an adaptation for definite roles (probably a complex set of interacting
functions). But these assumptions do not lead to the notion, often
uncritically embraced by strict Darwinians, that all major capacities
of the brain must arise as direct products of natural selection.
-- S.J. Gould, "The Mismeasure of Man"
|
|