Linux Science: 371 of 622 |
Pie are not square. Pie are round. Cornbread are square.
|
|
|
Linux Science: 372 of 622 |
Polymer physicists are into chains.
|
|
|
Linux Science: 373 of 622 |
Pound for pound, the amoeba is the most vicious animal on earth.
|
|
|
Linux Science: 374 of 622 |
Power corrupts. And atomic power corrupts atomically.
|
|
|
Linux Science: 375 of 622 |
Progress means replacing a theory that is wrong with one more subtly wrong.
|
|
|
Linux Science: 376 of 622 |
Proof techniques #1: Proof by Induction.
This technique is used on equations with "n" in them. Induction
techniques are very popular, even the military used them.
SAMPLE: Proof of induction without proof of induction.
We know it's true for n equal to 1. Now assume that it's true
for every natural number less than n. N is arbitrary, so we can take n
as large as we want. If n is sufficiently large, the case of n+1 is
trivially equivalent, so the only important n are n less than n. We
can take n = n (from above), so it's true for n+1 because it's just
about n.
QED. (QED translates from the Latin as "So what?")
|
|
|
Linux Science: 377 of 622 |
... proper attention to Earthly needs of the poor, the depressed and the
downtrodden, would naturally evolve from dynamic, articulate, spirited
awareness of the great goals for Man and the society he conspired to erect.
-- David Baker, paraphrasing Harold Urey, in
"The History of Manned Space Flight"
|
|
|
Linux Science: 378 of 622 |
Prototype designs always work.
-- Don Vonada
|
|
|
Linux Science: 379 of 622 |
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller
than the both put together."
|
|
|
Linux Science: 380 of 622 |
Psychologists think they're experimental psychologists.
Experimental psychologists think they're biologists.
Biologists think they're biochemists.
Biochemists think they're chemists.
Chemists think they're physical chemists.
Physical chemists think they're physicists.
Physicists think they're theoretical physicists.
Theoretical physicists think they're mathematicians.
Mathematicians think they're metamathematicians.
Metamathematicians think they're philosophers.
Philosophers think they're gods.
|
|