Freebsd Fortunes 3: 877 of 2182 |
DAWN:
The time when men of reason go to bed.
|
|
|
Freebsd Fortunes 3: 878 of 2182 |
Day of inquiry. You will be subpoenaed.
|
|
|
Freebsd Fortunes 3: 879 of 2182 |
DEADWOOD:
Anyone in your company who is more senior than you are.
|
|
|
Freebsd Fortunes 3: 880 of 2182 |
Dealing with failure is easy:
Work hard to improve.
Success is also easy to handle:
You've solved the wrong problem. Work hard to improve.
|
|
|
Freebsd Fortunes 3: 881 of 2182 |
Dealing with failure is easy: work hard to improve.
Success is also easy to handle: you've solved the wrong problem. Work
hard to improve.
|
|
|
Freebsd Fortunes 3: 882 of 2182 |
Dealing with the problem of pure staff accumulation,
all our researches ... point to an average increase of 5.75% per year.
-- C.N. Parkinson
|
|
|
Freebsd Fortunes 3: 883 of 2182 |
Dear Emily:
How can I choose what groups to post in?
-- Confused
Dear Confused:
Pick as many as you can, so that you get the widest audience. After
all, the net exists to give you an audience. Ignore those who suggest you
should only use groups where you think the article is highly appropriate.
Pick all groups where anybody might even be slightly interested.
Always make sure followups go to all the groups. In the rare event
that you post a followup which contains something original, make sure you
expand the list of groups. Never include a "Followup-to:" line in the
header, since some people might miss part of the valuable discussion in
the fringe groups.
-- Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette
|
|
|
Freebsd Fortunes 3: 884 of 2182 |
Dear Emily:
I collected replies to an article I wrote, and now it's time to
summarize. What should I do?
-- Editor
Dear Editor:
Simply concatenate all the articles together into a big file and post
that. On USENET, this is known as a summary. It lets people read all the
replies without annoying newsreaders getting in the way. Do the same when
summarizing a vote.
-- Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette
|
|
|
Freebsd Fortunes 3: 885 of 2182 |
Dear Emily:
I recently read an article that said, "reply by mail, I'll summarize."
What should I do?
-- Doubtful
Dear Doubtful:
Post your response to the whole net. That request applies only to
dumb people who don't have something interesting to say. Your postings are
much more worthwhile than other people's, so it would be a waste to reply by
mail.
-- Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette
|
|
|
Freebsd Fortunes 3: 886 of 2182 |
Dear Emily:
I saw a long article that I wish to rebut carefully, what should
I do?
-- Angry
Dear Angry:
Include the entire text with your article, and include your comments
between the lines. Be sure to post, and not mail, even though your article
looks like a reply to the original. Everybody *loves* to read those long
point-by-point debates, especially when they evolve into name-calling and
lots of "Is too!" -- "Is not!" -- "Is too, twizot!" exchanges.
-- Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette
|
|